home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: paperboy@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Chris Chuter)
- Subject: SPEECH: Summary of Brenda Laurel's speech at UT-Austin
- Date: 1 Mar 1993 14:48:47 GMT
- Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
-
-
- A friend recently asked for me to summarize a speech given by Brenda Laurel
- (editor of _The Art of Human Interface Design_) that I recently attended at
- the University of Texas at Austin. I thought I'd post it FYI.....
-
-
- Well, I don't really know where to start - she seemed to have 10-20 pages
- that she read from, thus the vernacular was quite rich at times. She
- rattled off ideas and peoples names without much explanation at times,
- but if you knew what she was speaking about (i.e. done more things with
- vr than see the lawnmower man) she wasn't to hard to keep up with.
-
- She's an attractive lady 'bout 5'6" with very quick wit - i'll get back to
- that later. Her degrees are in theater and she often emphasized the
- theatrical and philosopical sides of vr.
-
- She started her speech explaining stating how vr was just a fad like Atari
- (who she also worked for in the past) and would soon die out like anything
- else - she had me really thinking that vr had no future and i had been
- foolish to be so empassionated about such a subject. If you stayed you
- would soon realize that she was being very sarcastic to "trap" you as
- a listener. She obviously didn't believe vr was just a fad - after all, it is
- what pays _her_ bills at the end of the month.
-
- She talked about how vr started in theater. One example: A filmmaker
- projected films onto the objects that were filmed - projecting a ball onto
- a real ball. He then put a camera on a turntable in a room, had actors
- walk around the room as it was beeing filmed, then, spray painted the
- whole completely white. He showed the film by projecting the images onto
- their white shapes. Phantom people walked around the room and the effect
- was astounding. In her words, it was a "mind-fuck".
-
- She then talked about how new science discoveries were popping up due to
- vr. She said that studies have been done in which games were made with
- great sound and poor resolution and games were made with poor sound and
- great resolution. The games that had bad sound/poor resolution were rated
- as poor, but the ones with good sound were actually rated as good and the
- resolution was said to be good to. Somehow she related this to vr - i cant
- remember exactly how, perhaps that the key to true immersive vr was sound.
-
- She then started talking about the computer indusrty and vr. She talked
- about Timothy Leary (She had recently made inferences that he was just jumping
- on the bandwagon - but in her speech she seemed to praise him). She never
- mentioned Jaron Lanier - even when she spoke of teh demise of VPL (its just a
- fad - don't invest *more sarcasm, little truth -though* she said) - I wanted to
- ask her why she never mentioned Lanier, but I never got around to it.
-
- She explained how if computers weren't designed initially for the census
- bureau and maybe instead for the army corps of engineers it wouldnt have
- been text based - maybe more graphically based and vr would have happened
- earlier. She mentioned MUD's, but didn't really say much more than people
- were getting addicted to it and often their grades would fall.
-
- She talked extensively how this wonderful thing called the internet would
- soon fall simply because the gov't pays for it and its toooooo much fun.
- There's bound to be money made off of it and thats what would stop it from
- being like it is today.
-
- She stated that TV and vr wont be in the future - contrary to the new
- types of cable-vr (not very immersive) - but the phone companies will, simply
- because the phone companies don't care what goes through the phone lines.
- She made an interesting metaphor to phone sex. Come to think of it the
- whole speech was full of eloquent metaphors - almost like a poetry
- reading, I remember feeling awkward at first listening to her.
-
- Then she started to talk about the things that she was interested in vr.
- She didnt stated this directly, but i deduced this from her tone. The main
- thing she loves about vr is its mystery - the fact that we have no idea
- what it will uncover and researchers are doing things in dark labs at MIT
- and back alleys to see relationship between vr and humans. She spoke about
- an experiment where one kitten was never allowed to crawl and one was. They were
- put in a room with vertical lines as wallpaper. The kitten that was allowed to
- crawl developed vertical vision and the other one was blind.
-
- How do we know how vr will affect humans? if we allow a child to grow up
- in normal life and in an immersive virtual world will the child grow up
- with extra senses - sorta 5D? At the end of her speech she mentioned being
- a mother and that she has not yet let her children see vr - either it
- will fry their brain or they'll say "so what?" . She said these were
- the aspects and research concerning vr that made her tingle...
-
-
- end of summary - I wish i could remember more, its all i can remember at the
- moment. I may have included a lot of my opinions, but i tried to be as
- objective as possible.
-
- -Chris Chuter
- paperboy@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
-